Best Kept Tucson / 2026 voter information

Proposition 426

Six public properties. One districtwide decision.

Proposition 426 asks Amphitheater Unified School District voters whether to authorize the Governing Board to sell, lease or exchange all or part of six district-owned properties.

Fact checked September 21, 2026

The ballot question

What your vote means

Proposition 426 asks one legal question: whether voters will grant the Amphi Governing Board the requested property authority.

Vote

YES

Grants the requested authority.

  • The Governing Board may sell, lease or exchange all or part of any of the six listed properties.
  • Proceeds may be used for school sites, buildings, improvements, equipment, technology, student transportation vehicles and other permitted capital expenditures.
  • A Yes vote does not itself complete a sale, select a buyer or approve a specific transaction.
Vote

NO

Does not grant the requested authority.

  • Proposition 426 would not authorize the Governing Board to sell, lease or exchange the six listed properties.
  • The measure would not generate proceeds for the capital uses described in the ballot question.
  • A No vote does not decide a property-specific future use; it rejects the authority requested in this measure.

What neither vote does: Neither choice immediately sells a property on Election Day. The official text says the district currently has no plan to sell a listed parcel and that any future sale decision, if authorized, would be made by the Governing Board.

Read the official proposition text ↗

Beyond the ballot wording

What authority provides.
What voters may weigh.

This second chart separates the authority a Yes vote would grant from other information voters may consider. It does not recommend a vote.

Authority a Yes vote would grant

The Governing Board could sell, lease or exchange all or part of any of the six listed properties.

Other information voters may weigh

The measure covers six properties with different locations, current uses and redevelopment characteristics in one authorization.

Authority a Yes vote would grant

Proceeds could fund school sites, buildings, improvements, equipment, technology, student transportation vehicles and other permitted capital expenses.

Other information voters may weigh

The ballot does not earmark proceeds for a named project, school, transportation purchase or property-specific replacement plan.

Authority a Yes vote would grant

The district would gain flexibility to respond to future capital needs and property conditions.

Other information voters may weigh

No buyer, transaction price, appraisal, sale schedule or proposed future use is identified in the ballot text.

Authority a Yes vote would grant

The official text states that the district currently has no plan to sell any of the listed parcels.

Other information voters may weigh

Future decisions would be made at the Governing Board's discretion after voters grant the authority.

Authority a Yes vote would grant

Current Arizona law limits how proceeds from school-property transactions may be used.

Other information voters may weigh

The ballot notes that existing law may change. The measure itself does not state a sunset date or require another property-specific election.

The public assets

Six sites.
About 59 acres.

Acreage alone does not determine value. Access, zoning, current use, improvements, utilities, environmental conditions and public replacement costs all matter.

Parcel A13.77 acres

San Joaquin property

5940 N. San Joaquin Ave.

Described in the official ballot text as vacant land.

Parcel B14.53 acres

Copper Creek Elementary site

11620 N. Copper Spring Trail, Oro Valley

A former neighborhood elementary-school campus.

Parcel C9.95 acres

Donaldson Elementary site

2040 W. Omar Drive, Tucson

A former elementary-school campus near the La Cholla corridor.

Parcel D6.64 acres

Amphi Land Lab

450 E. Wetmore Road, Tucson

An agricultural and career-technical education site. Its current operating scope should be confirmed by Amphi and Pima JTED.

Parcel E9.67 acres

Holaway Elementary site

3500-3501 N. Cherry Ave., Tucson

A former elementary-school campus in central Tucson.

Parcel F4.81 acres

Nash Elementary site

515 W. Kelso St., Tucson

A former elementary-school site comprising multiple assessor parcels.

Information still needed

What a complete property analysis would disclose

  • Independent appraisal and estimated net proceeds for each property
  • Current zoning, allowed uses, access, utilities and redevelopment constraints
  • Present occupancy, leases, enrollment and operating agreements
  • Building condition, demolition expense and adaptive-reuse potential
  • Known buyers, proposed uses and transaction timelines
  • Specific capital projects that would receive the proceeds
  • Public participation and conflict-of-interest safeguards
  • The cost of replacing or relocating any current educational use

Important distinction

The Land Lab should not yet be described as vacant or closed.

The Arizona Department of Education's July 2025 CTED list identifies JTED@Amphi Land Lab as a Pima JTED central campus. A separate Pima Community College instructional location at the address was reported closed in 2022. Those records do not establish the Land Lab property's complete operating status in 2026, so Amphi and Pima JTED should provide current program, enrollment and utilization information.

Primary sources

Check the record.

Best Kept Tucson will date material updates and correct documented errors. Source links open in a new tab.

  1. Pima County: 2026 General Election Full Text of Propositions
  2. Pima County School Superintendent: 2026 election information
  3. Amphitheater Public Schools: request for arguments and property list
  4. Arizona Department of Education: CTED map and list, July 2025
  5. U.S. Department of Education: September 2022 closed-school report
  6. Pima County: GIS and parcel research guidance

Editorial standard: This page is a public-information resource. It distinguishes official ballot language from questions or opinions attributed to measure supporters, opponents and residents. Best Kept Tucson does not represent Amphitheater Unified School District or Pima County.

Best Kept Tucson / Public information

Follow the facts.
Ask better questions.